Sony Brings Up Redfall Exclusivity Drama In Latest Argument

3.8
Cast your minds back a couple of weeks and you'll probably remember a little bit of drama surrounding upcoming Xbox exclusive Redfall. Developed by Arkane, director Harvey Smith dropped an unexpected bombshell by claiming that Redfall was originally meant to launch on PS5 alongside Xbox and PC. Smith explained that Microsoft had canned the PS5 version that was in development once it had completed its acquisition of Bethesda, and the PlayStation community at large began to pile in on Xbox and Phil Spencer.

Microsoft quickly issued a very carefully worded statement, claiming that it "hasn't pulled any games from PlayStation" and pointed to titles like Ghostwire: Tokyo and Deathloop as proof. It did very little to silence the critics at the time, as "pulling" a game implies you've made it unavailable for purchase after it already launched, something which Microsoft has admittedly never done. It just allegedly canned a PlayStation game in development instead.

The controversy has been largely forgotten now, but Sony has taken full advantage of Microsoft's mistake by bringing up Redfall in its latest argument as to why Microsoft shouldn't be allowed to own the Call of Duty series (thanks Eurogamer). In a response criticising the CMA for softening its stance on the Activision Blizzard acquisition, Sony has used the recent Redfall controversy as proof that Microsoft cannot be trusted to uphold any deals regarding Call of Duty exclusivity.



"Just last week, two days before the Addendum was published, on 22nd March, video game trade publication IGN published fresh evidence in the form of an interview with Redfall's creative director, Harvey Smith, that provides additional insight into Microsoft's strategy," writes Sony.

"Like Call of Duty, Redfall is a first-person shooter game that features both single player and cooperative multiplayer modes. In his interview with IGN, Mr. Smith explained that Redfall was originally planned to be released on all platforms, including PlayStation, but once Microsoft acquired Bethesda, there was a 'huge sea change ... [Microsoft] said, "No PlayStation 5. Now we’re gonna [sic] do Game Pass, Xbox, and PC.'"

Sony claims that this is "compelling evidence" that Microsoft has incentive to stop games from releasing on rival platforms, and that it will do the same with Call of Duty once the acquisition of Activision Blizzard goes through. Microsoft has also released a statement to the CMA's latest findings, unsurprisingly claiming the exact opposite, stating that it has "no incentive to withhold or degrade access to Call of Duty".


None of this is too surprising, especially if you've been keeping track of the arguments that are making both Sony and Microsoft sound like petty children. However, it does signal to Microsoft that Sony is always watching, waiting for any opportunity for the company to slip up so it can take advantage. Whether this Redfall drama has changed the minds of any regulators remains to be seen though.



Posted:
Related Forum: PlayStation Forum

Source: https://www.thegamer.com/sony-uses-redfall-exclusivity-controversy-in-call-of-duty-argument/

Comments

"Sony Brings Up Redfall Exclusivity Drama In Latest Argument" :: Login/Create an Account :: 4 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

ReidsoPosted:

oh ffs, more drama

who needs them tv soaps, when you have Sony and MSoft?

blueand0rangePosted:

PlayStation has so many more exclusives and "f you's" to Xbox players that's it's been ridiculous over the last 5 years. Every AAA game that has released seems to have exclusive PlayStation content within it and PlayStation has numerous titles that will never release on Xbox, such as God of War. It's about time Xbox fans get a win.

Mario350Posted:

"sony is the ones blocking games" no phil spencer and microsoft you guys are the ones screwing everyone else over by blocking games on other platforms, just like tim sweeney.

i remember when microsoft wanted crossplay and sony said no, and now its microsoft saying no to sony for games, ironic isnt it, anyways since the game is coming to pc it was never an xbox exclusive theres still no point in owning an xbox when theres nothing remotely on xbox to play that isnt on playstation or pc(all microsoft games are now on pc),

remember every xbox fanboy moved over to playstation and pc when microsoft said no used games drm 24hour xbl checksum before youre forced to buy a new xbox ect,

people should be able to play a game on a platform they want, i never agreed with exclusives i never agreed with console wars since all consoles play the same game, but i do agree that players should have a choice on where they want to play the game on.

sony has alot of good arguments that would ruin microsofts reputation and force microsoft to allow their first parties to put games on playstation again.

RuntsPosted:

They don't need to sweat it but the game is cool and Sony should get it it's not a good enough game to be exclusive imo.