Sales of Call of Duty are disappointing.

4.6
Sales of Black Ops 2 are currently looking to be down 15 percent on last years launch of Modern Warfare 3. Which itself was down 5 percent on the previous years Black Ops launch. This is despite it's incredible $500 Million first day sales.

Analysts are calling this trend “a cause for concern” for Activision-Blizzard as the Call of Duty franchise is responsible of 45% of Activision's earnings.

Players and reviewers have become increasingly complacent regarding the latest Call of Duty releases, going so far as to call Treyarch and Infinity Ward, lazy. Shorter single player campaigns and the same old game engine being the most common complaints.


David Vondehaar recently had to defend the use of an ancient (in gaming years) gaming engine. “Anybody who comes at the engine needs to remember it's the 60 frames they love in the first place," he asserted. "And we can make it beautiful - that's through years and years of working with the engine, improving upon it and improving the pipeline and improving our approach, our lighting rendering.”

"People like to talk about the engine, but the truth of the matter is that this isn't like something that was invented six years ago. At this point that engine doesn't resemble anything like any engine - we've ripped out the UI system, the rendering and the lighting are all new, the core gameplay systems are all new.”

Posted:
Related Forum: PlayStation Forum

Comments

"Sales of Call of Duty are disappointing." :: Login/Create an Account :: 149 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

PersistencePosted:

Personally, I don't think they can beat games like MW2. It was the first CoD with selectable killstreaks and I think that in addition to where the campaign left off in CoD4, it created the proper buzz to produce the figures people automatically expect from the CoD franchise today.

AAmbitionsIsBackPosted:

Wiz- The next one has to be like Battlefield 3. Big maps, realistic snipers, new weapons, new camouflage, weapon DLC. New crap, basically.


Wiz are you dumb? What would be the point of CoD then? Plus my opinion is that Battlefield sucks! I returned that game in the first week for a full refund. I play Cod because its CoD. I like the faster gameplay etc. Plus Black Ops is better than black Ops 1 multiplayer i believe. Zombies on the other hand i don't believe soo. But its still a good game and overall they should never copy battlefield.

epraiderPosted:

Wiz- The next one has to be like Battlefield 3. Big maps, realistic snipers, new weapons, new camouflage, weapon DLC. New crap, basically.


Why not just play Battlefield then? Or just stop Call of Duty instead of copying other games. I'll just be playing Battlefield 3 if they try to make it similar, because CoD will never work as well as Battlefield does.

Third_EyePosted:

The people who were drawn away from the series might just wait for the holidays rather than spending their own money right now. It's too early to judge imo

GrizzlePosted:

Had the game for 3 weeks now, pretty repetitive. COD lost it's spark a long time ago.

car_twoPosted:

I bet if activision and treyarch actually looked at all the comments and listened. Their games would be a lot better

Wiz-Posted:

-Tacodevil- Lazy my butt, Treyarch wanted to give players a choice by adding different endings in BO 2. The players shouldn't be disappointed with the game or call the developers lazy they work everyday, if the players have something against it then they should develop their own game that gives them their own satisfaction lol. It's not fair that players talk trash to the developers after all the hard work developing the next big game. They have a hard time as it is trying to sync everything up perfectly with the whole story-line and a good even environment for both players to shoot it out.

So you call a campaign that has new gadgets that you only get to use once and normally just to get to the next objective good? A campaign with multiple endings that are different from making 2 choices a choice? Glitches patched on day 1 but not since. Same old engine. Only 4 map packs that are actually already made. New game modes but take forever to release. A multiplayer which is exactly the same but even worse. A zombies mode which is 10 times as bad as the over 2.

Wiz-Posted:

The next one has to be like Battlefield 3. Big maps, realistic snipers, new weapons, new camouflage, weapon DLC. New crap, basically.

LostPosted:

I was expecting this, making the same game over and over with little visual tweaks is not going to get the job done

Spaceman_StuPosted:

Disorts Well activision when you make you games seem effort less i mean what do you expect? a good job. the only good COD games were mw2 cod4 and thats it. besides that every game since then it seems like you guys do not listen to the community as a whole.


No love for the old Call of Duties? Number 2 was amazing. I do agree that the last good one was MW2 however. If they would've stayed in the direction of Call Of Duty 3's multiplayer and added custom classes, Call of Duty would be kinda cool. Call of Duty 3 was akin to Halo, sort of. It had vehicles and pretty big maps.