Next Call of Duty reveal by E3, Activision community manager suggests

4.5
Activision social media manager Dan Amrich has said he expects 2013's entry in the Call of Duty series, which may be Modern Warfare 4, to be revealed no later than E3 in early June.

Speaking to fans in a YouTube video, he said: "We're still deep in the middle of the Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 cycle and there's still a lot more content to come, so you can understand why Activision hasn't really talked about next year yet, but they're going to have to soon, because E3 is coming up."
Amrich noted that the last two Call of Duty games were revealed in May 2011 and May 2012.

"If you're looking for information on the future, it's coming soon, it's just not here yet, it should be here no later than E3," he said.

"We also have the interesting problem of new hardware coming in. We've got a PS4, we've got whatever Xbox is working on - is that going to be this year, I don't know."

Last year, a CV belonging to an Infinity Ward software engineer suggested that the studio's next Call of Duty game will release on both current and next-gen consoles.

It has been heavily rumoured that Microsoft will reveal the next-gen Xbox at an as-yet-unannounced event on May 21, and given the platform holder's strong business ties to Activision's series, it wouldn't be surprising to hear some information about the next Call of Duty game around the same time.

Posted:
Related Forum: Gaming Discussion

Source: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/401998/next-call-of-duty-reveal-by-e3-activision-community-manager-suggests/

Related Articles

Comments

"Next Call of Duty reveal by E3, Activision community manager suggests" :: Login/Create an Account :: 123 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

ConvergePosted:

Hopefully MW4 won't suck like MW3, it was to robotic, they need to make it play more like mw2

xPhotographPosted:

Seed From what I heard it would be called call of duty ghosts from a different news post....guess not anymore


where did you see that?

catpicsPosted:

Seed
DopestDope_Eva YAY another game which is the same same as the other 23290482093 CoD games that are out already..


That post seriously made you win the internet


Most of them are not the same at all

catpicsPosted:

Seed From what I heard it would be called call of duty ghosts from a different news post....guess not anymore


Thats what i heard but i guess they changed there minds

SeedPosted:

DopestDope_Eva YAY another game which is the same same as the other 23290482093 CoD games that are out already..


That post seriously made you win the internet

SeedPosted:

From what I heard it would be called call of duty ghosts from a different news post....guess not anymore

BradPosted:

I thought next was going to be call of duty: ghost, which was a follow-on of MW3 but they were going to branch it into it's own series?

BFVPosted:

I think CoD has been ruined because of the complexity and age of player who play. There is too much to absorb and the more recent CoD titles have become too unbalanced. Like all these scorestreak systems and wildcards and so many attatcments/ranks/challanges ect. I personally think CoD 4 and WaW were the best because of the simplicity. And now CoD just seems to adapt to a more competitive gameplay aspect rather than a casual gaming aspect.

Like Bias said: They should just start a new franchise, because CoD is becoming the same all the time. Just new guns and maps.

Scared_of_WaterPosted:

Literacy
Kerrigan
iCustom
Kerrigan
-Fluttershy-
Horizex
Literacy Call Of Duty: Black Ops 2 was made to be revolved around the competitive community, Infinity Ward do the same please.

There is no competitiveness to a game that doesn't take skill call of duty will never take skill.


League Play is 100% competitive.



Hardly.

I was placed in high platinum.
Everyone just sits in a corner with snipers in the games I join.


League play has a new/different matchmaking system that search games with player that have almost the same skills that you have. Many player use team work in there so I recommend you to be with some friends (at least 3). If you go by your self trust me you will get your a** beat unless your team is you and a party of 5. I know because I have experience it. I don't know why you find people sitting in a corner with a sniper because every game I play (because you can't join a started game) almost anybody is using assault rifles or sub-machine guns.


You're very lucky. I have maybe 1 out of 6 games with normal players. I just have bad luck when it comes to that game.
Either way, you can pull it off playing by yourself. It's even harder in the Championship Series, usually people rehearse the maps and if you're alone it's horrible.

But as far as being competitive, no.
In my opinion, competitive is each team being balanced and whoever has more skill wins. Call of Duty just isn't like that anymore.

The League play actually came from Starcraft 2. It's made by the company that merged with Activision years ago, it is way more competitive in Starcraft. They should adjust it in my opinion.


Except CoD has a $100,000 tournament for the competitive gamers, something that the Battlefield community will never get. And some of the Halo competitive players cry because their game can't get $100,000 tournament. The game takes team work to win not individual skill. Just like in real life you get things done as a team.


I guessing you missed the virgin gaming battlefield 3 tournament back when bf3 came out where the prize money was 1.5 million

YurPosted:

Hopefully it's as good as mw2 and mw3 :)


Latest Downloads

Latest Tutorials