Battlefield 4 is the most pre-ordered next-gen game

4.4
Battlefield 4 is currently the most pre-ordered PlayStation 4 and Xbox One game. It’s outselling not only its main rival, Call of Duty Ghosts, but also the first party launch titles from Sony and Microsoft.
According to the latest pre-order charts from VGChartz, Battlefield 4 is pre-ordered more than the PS4 launch titles such as Killzone Shadow Fall, and Microsoft titles such as Forza Motorsport 5. Suffice to say, there is huge anticipation around Battlefield 4 at this point.
Thanks to a successful E3, pre-orders have rocketed at GameStop and Amazon. The success was so great at Amazon, that they chose to bundle Battlefield 4 with some of the PlayStation 4 pre-orders.
Battlefield will launch on October 29, and pre-orders have been available for months now. A special Deluxe version includes access to the Battlefield 4 beta, which will also be available to all BF3 Premium members. BF4′s main rival this Fall, Call of Duty Ghosts, launches just a week later, so competition will be immense, just as it was in 2011 between BF3 and Modern Warfare 3.



Posted:
Related Forum: Gaming Discussion

Source: http://bf4central.com/2013/06/battlefield-4-is-the-most-pre-ordered-next-gen-game/

Related Articles

Comments

"Battlefield 4 is the most pre-ordered next-gen game" :: Login/Create an Account :: 231 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

kal45Posted:

Katsumi
jacobistheboss
Katsumi
jreppt
coDyDaTallGuy
Katsumi
Starify
igetgains I do not see the difference between Battlefield 3 or 4. Just saying...


60 FPS and really good graphics mate. They have also brought back commander mode which is cool. It will feel a loot different between the two games.


There will also be a fair few game-play changes implemented. Improved Guns, Maps and

more players on consoles is an example of this. Battlefield 4 will take advantage of new generation hardware to make our game experience as immersive as possible


Where as Call of Duty is still to afraid to be innovative, and refuses to give up there old engine. Which I would like to point out is just a copy/paste of the old Quake III: Arena engine.


Do you honestly believe that the frostbite 3 engine is brand new?


The Frostbite 3 engine was also used in Battlefield 3


frostbite 2 was in bf3 you **** spastic ****


Well my bad. I must of read my information incorrectly. There is no need to verbally abuse me because of this. Seeming that Frostbite 3 hasn't been used in Battlefield before i am really looking forward to this new engine.


Yeah of cours frostbite 3 is brand new. A gaint company like EA has been working on this for 3 years now. They didn't just make it for battlefield 4 thoug, they made it so
It will be the engine for all their games (I don't really understand how they do that, but yeah the new need for speed is even running frostbite 3

PlusnetPosted:

-Tam i think this might out sell cod this time round


It will. CoD has been going downhill since Mw2.

WispPosted:

Good for Ea and Dice.
I'm glad people now realize that battlefield is better game than cod.

-TamPosted:

i think this might out sell cod this time round

KatsumiPosted:

jacobistheboss
Katsumi
jreppt
coDyDaTallGuy
Katsumi
Starify
igetgains I do not see the difference between Battlefield 3 or 4. Just saying...


60 FPS and really good graphics mate. They have also brought back commander mode which is cool. It will feel a loot different between the two games.


There will also be a fair few game-play changes implemented. Improved Guns, Maps and more players on consoles is an example of this. Battlefield 4 will take advantage of new generation hardware to make our game experience as immersive as possible


Where as Call of Duty is still to afraid to be innovative, and refuses to give up there old engine. Which I would like to point out is just a copy/paste of the old Quake III: Arena engine.


Do you honestly believe that the frostbite 3 engine is brand new?


The Frostbite 3 engine was also used in Battlefield 3


frostbite 2 was in bf3 you **** spastic ****


Well my bad. I must of read my information incorrectly. There is no need to verbally abuse me because of this. Seeming that Frostbite 3 hasn't been used in Battlefield before i am really looking forward to this new engine.

jacobisthebossPosted:

Katsumi
jreppt
coDyDaTallGuy
Katsumi
Starify
igetgains I do not see the difference between Battlefield 3 or 4. Just saying...


60 FPS and really good graphics mate. They have also brought back commander mode which is cool. It will feel a loot different between the two games.


There will also be a fair few game-play changes implemented. Improved Guns, Maps and more players on consoles is an example of this. Battlefield 4 will take advantage of new generation hardware to make our game experience as immersive as possible


Where as Call of Duty is still to afraid to be innovative, and refuses to give up there old engine. Which I would like to point out is just a copy/paste of the old Quake III: Arena engine.


Do you honestly believe that the frostbite 3 engine is brand new?


The Frostbite 3 engine was also used in Battlefield 3


frostbite 2 was in bf3 you **** spastic ****

AustraliansPosted:

NikolaiLoverG935
Busselton
NikolaiLoverG935
Busselton
LuckyOtter
NikolaiLoverG935
-Trippyy see this is what happens when COD just releases the same game with a different title and such every year, more and more people go towards battlefield, i am not surprised by this


No, this is what happens when IW makes a CoD. You do know that BF also makes a new game every year? Technically, with CoD, it's every two years, as IW makes a game, then Treyarch. The only problem is IW sucks so much, and that's probably why it's not as pre-ordered.


Umm... Last time I checked BF3 came out in 2011. This is coming out in 2013. I don't know if you learned basic math in your school but that equals two. Which I understand is the same amount of time IW or Treyarch spends making a game. Also IW I would have to say has done waaaay better than Treyarch with MW1 and MW2. They made the terrible game that was MW3 but Treyarch didn't exactly do great with Bo2. Bo1 was decent and WaW was fun with zombies. Anyway I say IW makes better games.


yeah lol, they've made 3 Battlefield's in 6 years, let him do the maths XD Well, not to mention Battlefield 1943 but thats an arcade game with only 3 maps, fun as hell tho :)


You ignorant fool, I have done the math. Let me take a step back, since arrogance of your level can't comprehend simple things.

Battlefield 1942 - 2002
Battlefield Vietnam - 2004
Battlefield 2 - 2005
Battlefield 2142 - 2006
Battlefield Bad Company - 2008
Battlefield Heroes & Battlefield 1943 - 2009
Battlefield Bad Company 2 - 2010
Battlefield Play4Free & Battlefield 3 - 2011
Battlefield 4 - 2013

That's 12 games in the past 11 years. Don't talk, kiddo.


God, i said in the last 6 years, and i didn't say anything about the other games, I meant the main ones, BFBC 1 and 2, and Battlefield 3. God sake people like you annoy me.


Ignorance at it's finest. Those are main games, you bumbling fool. DICE made them, and they're main games in the Battlefield series. In the past 6 years (2008-2013) they have made 7 whole games. Bad Company 1, 2 and Battlefield 3 aren't their only main games. Ignorant scum like you annoy me. That's like saying CoD 4 up to CoD Ghosts are the only main CoD games, you mental oyster. I actually enjoy and play their other games, you pompous ass.


What a lovely topic, to bad this is the wrong place for it. I have never seen anyone talk about all those games apart from BFBC 1,2 and Battlefield 3, so go have a cry on someones shoulders. And thanks for those wonderful insults, they've made me unhappy with life. Anyway, I'll send you a Sailor Moon DVD boxset if you like, because this conversation is over, if you reply to me, i just simply wont answer cos your post has caused an arguement lol. peace.

AustraliansPosted:

wok
LuckyOtter
NikolaiLoverG935
-Trippyy see this is what happens when COD just releases the same game with a different title and such every year, more and more people go towards battlefield, i am not surprised by this


No, this is what happens when IW makes a CoD. You do know that BF also makes a new game every year? Technically, with CoD, it's every two years, as IW makes a game, then Treyarch. The only problem is IW sucks so much, and that's probably why it's not as pre-ordered.


Umm... Last time I checked BF3 came out in 2011. This is coming out in 2013. I don't know if you learned basic math in your school but that equals two. Which I understand is the same amount of time IW or Treyarch spends making a game. Also IW I would have to say has done waaaay better than Treyarch with MW1 and MW2. They made the terrible game that was MW3 but Treyarch didn't exactly do great with Bo2. Bo1 was decent and WaW was fun with zombies. Anyway I say IW makes better games.


I preferred IW games, cod 4, cod 4 has got to be one of the best games ever. It was so good, especially at the time when not many good games were out. I loved that game, its what got me into gaming, i had it on my pc, but it was pretty lonely, so i went out a bought a xbox to play it on, and i still love it and play it today. And mw2, didn't mw2 have like the biggest community or something? Because it fit the whole community, because the regular games were great, like the P90, or acr. And you could 'trickshot' on it, so it also fit that community, and it had a decent campaign, and was generally a good game. I personally agree that IW are better, and although battlefield is a great game, i think cod will always be ahead.


I just wished they carried on with Modern Warfare, best series in CoD. Had a cliffhanger in MW3 but I'm sure it could go on. Battlefield over CoD any day tho.

WokzePosted:

LuckyOtter
NikolaiLoverG935
-Trippyy see this is what happens when COD just releases the same game with a different title and such every year, more and more people go towards battlefield, i am not surprised by this


No, this is what happens when IW makes a CoD. You do know that BF also makes a new game every year? Technically, with CoD, it's every two years, as IW makes a game, then Treyarch. The only problem is IW sucks so much, and that's probably why it's not as pre-ordered.


Umm... Last time I checked BF3 came out in 2011. This is coming out in 2013. I don't know if you learned basic math in your school but that equals two. Which I understand is the same amount of time IW or Treyarch spends making a game. Also IW I would have to say has done waaaay better than Treyarch with MW1 and MW2. They made the terrible game that was MW3 but Treyarch didn't exactly do great with Bo2. Bo1 was decent and WaW was fun with zombies. Anyway I say IW makes better games.


I preferred IW games, cod 4, cod 4 has got to be one of the best games ever. It was so good, especially at the time when not many good games were out. I loved that game, its what got me into gaming, i had it on my pc, but it was pretty lonely, so i went out a bought a xbox to play it on, and i still love it and play it today. And mw2, didn't mw2 have like the biggest community or something? Because it fit the whole community, because the regular games were great, like the P90, or acr. And you could 'trickshot' on it, so it also fit that community, and it had a decent campaign, and was generally a good game. I personally agree that IW are better, and although battlefield is a great game, i think cod will always be ahead.

AustraliansPosted:

LuckyOtter
NikolaiLoverG935
-Trippyy see this is what happens when COD just releases the same game with a different title and such every year, more and more people go towards battlefield, i am not surprised by this


No, this is what happens when IW makes a CoD. You do know that BF also makes a new game every year? Technically, with CoD, it's every two years, as IW makes a game, then Treyarch. The only problem is IW sucks so much, and that's probably why it's not as pre-ordered.


Umm... Last time I checked BF3 came out in 2011. This is coming out in 2013. I don't know if you learned basic math in your school but that equals two. Which I understand is the same amount of time IW or Treyarch spends making a game. Also IW I would have to say has done waaaay better than Treyarch with MW1 and MW2. They made the terrible game that was MW3 but Treyarch didn't exactly do great with Bo2. Bo1 was decent and WaW was fun with zombies. Anyway I say IW makes better games.


yeah lol, they've made 3 Battlefield's in 6 years, let him do the maths XD Well, not to mention Battlefield 1943 but thats an arcade game with only 3 maps, fun as hell tho :)


Latest Downloads

Latest Tutorials