Titanfall critics are "assuming things" based on older shooters

4.7
Titanfall designer Justin Hendry has suggested that backlash surrounding the shooter’s 6v6 player cap comes from assumptions surrounding other shooters that perhaps allow for greater player-counts.

It follows confirmation that Titanfall will not include a microtransaction model.

Speaking with OXM, Hendry said of the player-count issue, “No, it’s not annoying to me. I didn’t really think about it. I guess we’re confident with the decisions that we’re making, and we agree that the gameplay is best this way.

He continued, “I think when people get the chance to play they’ll hopefully understand. People have a certain amount of apprehension based on the games they’re playing right now, and that they’ve been playing. I don’t blame them for having that outlook, and saying that they’re going to be bored – they’re assuming things based on what they’ve played, and I understand why people do that.

“So it’s not annoying at all, I get it, but I just hope that people give it a chance and make their minds up after they’ve played the game.”

After having played Titanfall last year, I wrote a blog about why 6v6 probably isn’t something you should worry about.

Agree/disagree? Let us know below.

Posted:
Related Forum: Gaming Discussion

Source: http://www.vg247.com/2014/01/24/titanfall-player-count-criticism-comes-from-assumptions-of-other-shooters-says-respawn/

Comments

"Titanfall critics are "assuming things" based on older shooters" :: Login/Create an Account :: 79 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

MikuPosted:

6v6 is definatley enough if it had lots of players like on Battlefield imagine how many robots would be roaming around, you would stand no chance. If they were to update they should do 10v10 no more.

DissPosted:

daRealRush
Dreams 6v6 is more then enough anything over and it gets chaotic


I think 6v6 is enough, especially if the maps aren't really that big. If the maps were huge, then 6v6 would just be a big 'no' in my opinion.


I also agree that 6v6 is quite enough. There will be a lot of AI's on the battlefield at the same time to make it an enjoyable experience.

MaggardoPosted:

Dreams 6v6 is more then enough anything over and it gets chaotic


I think 6v6 is enough, especially if the maps aren't really that big. If the maps were huge, then 6v6 would just be a big 'no' in my opinion.

MobyPosted:

Completely agree, after playing the beta i can see why more than 6v6 can be chaotic and completely ruin the whole gaming experience.

OasisPosted:

Hopefully people won't ruin the game.

DreamsPosted:

6v6 is more then enough anything over and it gets chaotic

Martin_Luther_PingPosted:

I'm fine with 6v6 on this game. Coming from Battlefield, map size determines how much action is in the game as apposed to player count.

ItsThyPosted:

Yeah people think that every FPS is going to be a BF or a CoD clone, but 6v6 is going to be great. It'll be even with the AI as well.

AlexPosted:

Since I'm used to 16v16 on bf4 it will be weird but hey that's why you have beta's