You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#41. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,179
Reputation Power: 384
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 28, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,179
Reputation Power: 384
Macbook Pro for sure. Great laptop right there.
- 2useful
- 3not useful
#42. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 144
Reputation Power: 6
2011 Dual Core 2.5ghz, 4gb, 500gb MacBook Pro = 730 pounds
You want something that will accomplish what your going for but this looks the best out of them.
You want something that will accomplish what your going for but this looks the best out of them.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#43. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,414
Reputation Power: 24459
Status: Offline
Joined: May 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 16,414
Reputation Power: 24459
pvtjokr88 wrote why is it that whenever someone mentions an interest in getting a mac, theres always such emotional responses???
its like getting a harley as opposed to a sport bike, they do the same thing but in a different style.
almost no one here seemed to even read the op, he listed out 6 options but of course people start giving out unrelated, unsolicited advice going away from the original question.
Given the choices, i would think any of the 2011's would be best, all it comes down to is whether you need a desktop or something mobile
It's more like buying Beats instead of real headphones. Same price, but worse in every way.
We'll respond how we please, thank you. If we think none are a good choice, that's what we'll post.
- 4useful
- 0not useful
#44. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 06, 201014Year Member
Posts: 8,002
Reputation Power: 426
Tom_Brady wrote Macbook Pro for sure. Great laptop right there.
Not too great of a laptop considering the price, no.
- 2useful
- 0not useful
#45. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: May 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 347
Reputation Power: 16
Status: Offline
Joined: May 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 347
Reputation Power: 16
Wow some people don't know how to accept hard facts, evidence and good advice from experts that are well known in these areas of TTG, Honestly. I really don't know how many times Generation, and r00t_b33r wasted their time giving you good advice and to save your money and people, please stop posting "MACS ARE BAD" I think that was already established 5 pages ago...
- 1useful
- 0not useful
#46. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201212Year Member
Posts: 7,171
Reputation Power: 337
#47. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,066
Reputation Power: 53
MacBook Pro all the way i have it and i love it so much
- 1useful
- 1not useful
#48. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 08, 201212Year Member
Posts: 361
Reputation Power: 13
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 08, 201212Year Member
Posts: 361
Reputation Power: 13
pvtjokr88 wrote why is it that whenever someone mentions an interest in getting a mac, theres always such emotional responses???
its like getting a harley as opposed to a sport bike, they do the same thing but in a different style.
almost no one here seemed to even read the op, he listed out 6 options but of course people start giving out unrelated, unsolicited advice going away from the original question.
Given the choices, i would think any of the 2011's would be best, all it comes down to is whether you need a desktop or something mobile
Thanks for relating to what I wanted haha!
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#49. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 08, 201212Year Member
Posts: 361
Reputation Power: 13
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 08, 201212Year Member
Posts: 361
Reputation Power: 13
Stendra wrote 2011 Dual Core 2.5ghz, 4gb, 500gb MacBook Pro = 730 pounds
You want something that will accomplish what your going for but this looks the best out of them.
Thanks for the post
- 0useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.