You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#41. Posted:
Uncertainty
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201114Year Member
Posts: 1,610
Reputation Power: 75
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201114Year Member
Posts: 1,610
Reputation Power: 75
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote We better ban cars, and sex, and fast food then, cause STDs, diabetes, and car accidents kill people too. Come on guys, look at the statistics, guns only amount to 40% of homicides in the US. Death is just something that happens. It tragic when 20 children get shot, or 70 people get shot at a movie theater, but attempting to ban firearms isnt going to help the situation. If somebody feels the need to kill a bunch of people, stricter gun laws wont stop them from doing it. Even if guns were completely removed from society murder is still going to be something we are going to have to deal with.
Ok, so why don't we don't unban Assault rifles for civilian use than? it's not like that ban has helped anyone. Oh wait, IT HAS. Sure, there's no way to truly stop gun violence, but there are steps to tone it down. And "Guns only amount to 40% of gun homicides in the U.S." You say that like it's nothing. There are real people....

Civilians can still own assault rifles, they just cant be fully automatic. I understand that they are people, but the majority of that 40% will still exist after an assault rifle ban. Only 2% of shootings are committed with assault rifles. Thats not even half a percent of murders.
To be classified as an assault rifle, a weapon has to be a selective fire (Full auto, burst, Single) weapon. And the reason for banning Assault WEAPONS (Assault weapons are once again, banned!) is not to stop common street muggings, but to stop mass shootings. People need to understand that banning high capacity high power rifles is to stop tragedies such as Sandy Hook. If you want to be protected from a street killing, conceal a medium caliber handgun. Prior to contrary ignorant American belief, you don't need an AR-15 to kill something.

No, because the only weapons used in the Sandy Hook shooting were handguns.
Weapons used in shooting -
#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber-- model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round magazine.

#2. Glock 10 mm handgun

#3. Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun

The rifle was found on or near the scene. It wasn't fired at anyone. It was all done with handguns.
The Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun was found in Lanza's car. the Bushmaster was proven to be the weapon to kill all 26 victims, and the bullet cases found matched those of the Bushmaster.

You are acting like an assault rifle ban will eliminate mass shootings completely. I think the only thing they can do to help is make it so you need to have a mental evaluation before you can purchase a gun.
#42. Posted:
Scizor
  • Ninja
Status: Offline
Joined: May 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,678
Reputation Power: 33997
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Status: Offline
Joined: May 23, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,678
Reputation Power: 33997
Motto: This Film Is Dedicated To The Brave Mujahideen Fighters Of Afghanistan
Uncertainty wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote We better ban cars, and sex, and fast food then, cause STDs, diabetes, and car accidents kill people too. Come on guys, look at the statistics, guns only amount to 40% of homicides in the US. Death is just something that happens. It tragic when 20 children get shot, or 70 people get shot at a movie theater, but attempting to ban firearms isnt going to help the situation. If somebody feels the need to kill a bunch of people, stricter gun laws wont stop them from doing it. Even if guns were completely removed from society murder is still going to be something we are going to have to deal with.
Ok, so why don't we don't unban Assault rifles for civilian use than? it's not like that ban has helped anyone. Oh wait, IT HAS. Sure, there's no way to truly stop gun violence, but there are steps to tone it down. And "Guns only amount to 40% of gun homicides in the U.S." You say that like it's nothing. There are real people....

Civilians can still own assault rifles, they just cant be fully automatic. I understand that they are people, but the majority of that 40% will still exist after an assault rifle ban. Only 2% of shootings are committed with assault rifles. Thats not even half a percent of murders.
To be classified as an assault rifle, a weapon has to be a selective fire (Full auto, burst, Single) weapon. And the reason for banning Assault WEAPONS (Assault weapons are once again, banned!) is not to stop common street muggings, but to stop mass shootings. People need to understand that banning high capacity high power rifles is to stop tragedies such as Sandy Hook. If you want to be protected from a street killing, conceal a medium caliber handgun. Prior to contrary ignorant American belief, you don't need an AR-15 to kill something.

No, because the only weapons used in the Sandy Hook shooting were handguns.
Weapons used in shooting -
#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber-- model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round magazine.

#2. Glock 10 mm handgun

#3. Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun

The rifle was found on or near the scene. It wasn't fired at anyone. It was all done with handguns.
The Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun was found in Lanza's car. the Bushmaster was proven to be the weapon to kill all 26 victims, and the bullet cases found matched those of the Bushmaster.

You are acting like an assault rifle ban will eliminate mass shootings completely. I think the only thing they can do to help is make it so you need to have a mental evaluation before you can purchase a gun.
I'm not saying that it will stop mass shootings completely, but some childrens lives could have been saved if he didn't have that kind of firepower on him. They said more than 6 Fully loaded 30 round magazines were found on him. And sadly, he probably got it at walmart. We need an overhaul.
#43. Posted:
Uncertainty
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201114Year Member
Posts: 1,610
Reputation Power: 75
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201114Year Member
Posts: 1,610
Reputation Power: 75
Pyre wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote We better ban cars, and sex, and fast food then, cause STDs, diabetes, and car accidents kill people too. Come on guys, look at the statistics, guns only amount to 40% of homicides in the US. Death is just something that happens. It tragic when 20 children get shot, or 70 people get shot at a movie theater, but attempting to ban firearms isnt going to help the situation. If somebody feels the need to kill a bunch of people, stricter gun laws wont stop them from doing it. Even if guns were completely removed from society murder is still going to be something we are going to have to deal with.
Ok, so why don't we don't unban Assault rifles for civilian use than? it's not like that ban has helped anyone. Oh wait, IT HAS. Sure, there's no way to truly stop gun violence, but there are steps to tone it down. And "Guns only amount to 40% of gun homicides in the U.S." You say that like it's nothing. There are real people....

Civilians can still own assault rifles, they just cant be fully automatic. I understand that they are people, but the majority of that 40% will still exist after an assault rifle ban. Only 2% of shootings are committed with assault rifles. Thats not even half a percent of murders.
To be classified as an assault rifle, a weapon has to be a selective fire (Full auto, burst, Single) weapon. And the reason for banning Assault WEAPONS (Assault weapons are once again, banned!) is not to stop common street muggings, but to stop mass shootings. People need to understand that banning high capacity high power rifles is to stop tragedies such as Sandy Hook. If you want to be protected from a street killing, conceal a medium caliber handgun. Prior to contrary ignorant American belief, you don't need an AR-15 to kill something.

No, because the only weapons used in the Sandy Hook shooting were handguns.
Weapons used in shooting -
#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber-- model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round magazine.

#2. Glock 10 mm handgun

#3. Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun

The rifle was found on or near the scene. It wasn't fired at anyone. It was all done with handguns.
The Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun was found in Lanza's car. the Bushmaster was proven to be the weapon to kill all 26 victims, and the bullet cases found matched those of the Bushmaster.


Honestly, who cares about what gun was used. ALL guns should be banned from civilian use. End of. It'd stop the gun crime rate massively.

What about people who hunt, or target shoot?
#44. Posted:
Establish
  • TTG Contender
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,642
Reputation Power: 161
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 24, 201113Year Member
Posts: 3,642
Reputation Power: 161
Uncertainty wrote We better ban cars, and sex, and fast food then, cause STDs, diabetes, and car accidents kill people too. Come on guys, look at the statistics, guns only amount to 40% of homicides in the US. Death is just something that happens. It tragic when 20 children get shot, or 70 people get shot at a movie theater, but attempting to ban firearms isnt going to help the situation. If somebody feels the need to kill a bunch of people, stricter gun laws wont stop them from doing it. Even if guns were completely removed from society murder is still going to be something we are going to have to deal with.


:facepalm:

Do you just realize what you just said? Guns amount to 40 PERCENT of ALL HOMICIDES in the US. 40 percent is basically half of all homicides. By introducing more gun control, you cut down on the 40% of homicides in the US, by a huge amount. If I told you that half the people that die from homicides each year can be saved by introducing gun control, why not do it?


Last edited by Establish ; edited 1 time in total
#45. Posted:
Pathos
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
Uncertainty wrote
Pyre wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote We better ban cars, and sex, and fast food then, cause STDs, diabetes, and car accidents kill people too. Come on guys, look at the statistics, guns only amount to 40% of homicides in the US. Death is just something that happens. It tragic when 20 children get shot, or 70 people get shot at a movie theater, but attempting to ban firearms isnt going to help the situation. If somebody feels the need to kill a bunch of people, stricter gun laws wont stop them from doing it. Even if guns were completely removed from society murder is still going to be something we are going to have to deal with.
Ok, so why don't we don't unban Assault rifles for civilian use than? it's not like that ban has helped anyone. Oh wait, IT HAS. Sure, there's no way to truly stop gun violence, but there are steps to tone it down. And "Guns only amount to 40% of gun homicides in the U.S." You say that like it's nothing. There are real people....

Civilians can still own assault rifles, they just cant be fully automatic. I understand that they are people, but the majority of that 40% will still exist after an assault rifle ban. Only 2% of shootings are committed with assault rifles. Thats not even half a percent of murders.
To be classified as an assault rifle, a weapon has to be a selective fire (Full auto, burst, Single) weapon. And the reason for banning Assault WEAPONS (Assault weapons are once again, banned!) is not to stop common street muggings, but to stop mass shootings. People need to understand that banning high capacity high power rifles is to stop tragedies such as Sandy Hook. If you want to be protected from a street killing, conceal a medium caliber handgun. Prior to contrary ignorant American belief, you don't need an AR-15 to kill something.

No, because the only weapons used in the Sandy Hook shooting were handguns.
Weapons used in shooting -
#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber-- model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round magazine.

#2. Glock 10 mm handgun

#3. Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun

The rifle was found on or near the scene. It wasn't fired at anyone. It was all done with handguns.
The Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun was found in Lanza's car. the Bushmaster was proven to be the weapon to kill all 26 victims, and the bullet cases found matched those of the Bushmaster.


Honestly, who cares about what gun was used. ALL guns should be banned from civilian use. End of. It'd stop the gun crime rate massively.

What about people who hunt, or target shoot?


Don't hunt, or target shoot. There are millions of other interesting hobbies people take up that doesn't require a lethal weapon.
#46. Posted:
Chiellini
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 252
Reputation Power: 11
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 252
Reputation Power: 11
Pyre wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote We better ban cars, and sex, and fast food then, cause STDs, diabetes, and car accidents kill people too. Come on guys, look at the statistics, guns only amount to 40% of homicides in the US. Death is just something that happens. It tragic when 20 children get shot, or 70 people get shot at a movie theater, but attempting to ban firearms isnt going to help the situation. If somebody feels the need to kill a bunch of people, stricter gun laws wont stop them from doing it. Even if guns were completely removed from society murder is still going to be something we are going to have to deal with.
Ok, so why don't we don't unban Assault rifles for civilian use than? it's not like that ban has helped anyone. Oh wait, IT HAS. Sure, there's no way to truly stop gun violence, but there are steps to tone it down. And "Guns only amount to 40% of gun homicides in the U.S." You say that like it's nothing. There are real people....

Civilians can still own assault rifles, they just cant be fully automatic. I understand that they are people, but the majority of that 40% will still exist after an assault rifle ban. Only 2% of shootings are committed with assault rifles. Thats not even half a percent of murders.
To be classified as an assault rifle, a weapon has to be a selective fire (Full auto, burst, Single) weapon. And the reason for banning Assault WEAPONS (Assault weapons are once again, banned!) is not to stop common street muggings, but to stop mass shootings. People need to understand that banning high capacity high power rifles is to stop tragedies such as Sandy Hook. If you want to be protected from a street killing, conceal a medium caliber handgun. Prior to contrary ignorant American belief, you don't need an AR-15 to kill something.

No, because the only weapons used in the Sandy Hook shooting were handguns.
Weapons used in shooting -
#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber-- model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round magazine.

#2. Glock 10 mm handgun

#3. Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun

The rifle was found on or near the scene. It wasn't fired at anyone. It was all done with handguns.
The Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun was found in Lanza's car. the Bushmaster was proven to be the weapon to kill all 26 victims, and the bullet cases found matched those of the Bushmaster.


Honestly, who cares about what gun was used. ALL guns should be banned from civilian use. End of. It'd stop the gun crime rate massively.


Americans would go crazy and go out and buy every gun known to man before the law would even come into place. Some people that I know are already getting ready for that. It isn't a smart idea to ban guns. It's the schools that need to fix their security. I don't doubt that there are kids in that school that are in gangs, so this could've been gang related (I live in Georgia and the Atlanta area is pretty rough.) The kid could've easily hurt the other kid with something like a knife, so should we ban knives too because they have a possibility to be used as a weapon? Are they too dangerous for America too? The point is, people use guns for many good things, then there are people like this that use them for bad. Guns don't kill people, people kill people.
#47. Posted:
lal213
  • Resident Elite
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 257
Reputation Power: 10
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 18, 201113Year Member
Posts: 257
Reputation Power: 10
people are crazy now a days :/
#48. Posted:
Uncertainty
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201114Year Member
Posts: 1,610
Reputation Power: 75
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 02, 201114Year Member
Posts: 1,610
Reputation Power: 75
Pyre wrote
Uncertainty wrote
Pyre wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote We better ban cars, and sex, and fast food then, cause STDs, diabetes, and car accidents kill people too. Come on guys, look at the statistics, guns only amount to 40% of homicides in the US. Death is just something that happens. It tragic when 20 children get shot, or 70 people get shot at a movie theater, but attempting to ban firearms isnt going to help the situation. If somebody feels the need to kill a bunch of people, stricter gun laws wont stop them from doing it. Even if guns were completely removed from society murder is still going to be something we are going to have to deal with.
Ok, so why don't we don't unban Assault rifles for civilian use than? it's not like that ban has helped anyone. Oh wait, IT HAS. Sure, there's no way to truly stop gun violence, but there are steps to tone it down. And "Guns only amount to 40% of gun homicides in the U.S." You say that like it's nothing. There are real people....

Civilians can still own assault rifles, they just cant be fully automatic. I understand that they are people, but the majority of that 40% will still exist after an assault rifle ban. Only 2% of shootings are committed with assault rifles. Thats not even half a percent of murders.
To be classified as an assault rifle, a weapon has to be a selective fire (Full auto, burst, Single) weapon. And the reason for banning Assault WEAPONS (Assault weapons are once again, banned!) is not to stop common street muggings, but to stop mass shootings. People need to understand that banning high capacity high power rifles is to stop tragedies such as Sandy Hook. If you want to be protected from a street killing, conceal a medium caliber handgun. Prior to contrary ignorant American belief, you don't need an AR-15 to kill something.

No, because the only weapons used in the Sandy Hook shooting were handguns.
Weapons used in shooting -
#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber-- model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round magazine.

#2. Glock 10 mm handgun

#3. Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun

The rifle was found on or near the scene. It wasn't fired at anyone. It was all done with handguns.
The Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun was found in Lanza's car. the Bushmaster was proven to be the weapon to kill all 26 victims, and the bullet cases found matched those of the Bushmaster.


Honestly, who cares about what gun was used. ALL guns should be banned from civilian use. End of. It'd stop the gun crime rate massively.

What about people who hunt, or target shoot?


Don't hunt, or target shoot. There are millions of other interesting hobbies people take up that doesn't require a lethal weapon.

So all the responsible gun owners are expected to give up the second amendment, give the government there guns, and find something different to do with there time? thats ridiculous.
#49. Posted:
ExoticWolfs
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 20, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,585
Reputation Power: 126
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 20, 201311Year Member
Posts: 3,585
Reputation Power: 126
McGeady wrote Idk why they dont just ban guns already.


Are you stupid?! You just can't ban guns, sooo many more people would die and get injured. The people wouldn't be able to protect their self's and what not. You just can't do that, American society would probably collapse. Feel bad for the kid.
#50. Posted:
Pathos
  • TTG Champion
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 01, 201113Year Member
Posts: 8,932
Reputation Power: 415
Chiellini wrote
Pyre wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Yin wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote
UNSC wrote
Uncertainty wrote We better ban cars, and sex, and fast food then, cause STDs, diabetes, and car accidents kill people too. Come on guys, look at the statistics, guns only amount to 40% of homicides in the US. Death is just something that happens. It tragic when 20 children get shot, or 70 people get shot at a movie theater, but attempting to ban firearms isnt going to help the situation. If somebody feels the need to kill a bunch of people, stricter gun laws wont stop them from doing it. Even if guns were completely removed from society murder is still going to be something we are going to have to deal with.
Ok, so why don't we don't unban Assault rifles for civilian use than? it's not like that ban has helped anyone. Oh wait, IT HAS. Sure, there's no way to truly stop gun violence, but there are steps to tone it down. And "Guns only amount to 40% of gun homicides in the U.S." You say that like it's nothing. There are real people....

Civilians can still own assault rifles, they just cant be fully automatic. I understand that they are people, but the majority of that 40% will still exist after an assault rifle ban. Only 2% of shootings are committed with assault rifles. Thats not even half a percent of murders.
To be classified as an assault rifle, a weapon has to be a selective fire (Full auto, burst, Single) weapon. And the reason for banning Assault WEAPONS (Assault weapons are once again, banned!) is not to stop common street muggings, but to stop mass shootings. People need to understand that banning high capacity high power rifles is to stop tragedies such as Sandy Hook. If you want to be protected from a street killing, conceal a medium caliber handgun. Prior to contrary ignorant American belief, you don't need an AR-15 to kill something.

No, because the only weapons used in the Sandy Hook shooting were handguns.
Weapons used in shooting -
#1. Bushmaster .223 caliber-- model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round magazine.

#2. Glock 10 mm handgun

#3. Sig-Sauer P226 9mm handgun

The rifle was found on or near the scene. It wasn't fired at anyone. It was all done with handguns.
The Izhmash Canta-12 12 gauge Shotgun was found in Lanza's car. the Bushmaster was proven to be the weapon to kill all 26 victims, and the bullet cases found matched those of the Bushmaster.


Honestly, who cares about what gun was used. ALL guns should be banned from civilian use. End of. It'd stop the gun crime rate massively.


Americans would go crazy and go out and buy every gun known to man before the law would even come into place. Some people that I know are already getting ready for that. It isn't a smart idea to ban guns. It's the schools that need to fix their security. I don't doubt that there are kids in that school that are in gangs, so this could've been gang related (I live in Georgia and the Atlanta area is pretty rough.) The kid could've easily hurt the other kid with something like a knife, so should we ban knives too because they have a possibility to be used as a weapon? Are they too dangerous for America too? The point is, people use guns for many good things, then there are people like this that use them for bad. Guns don't kill people, people kill people.


Once again, I'll refer you back to my previous post. In Britain, the last mass shooting at a school was 40 years ago. We haven't had one since we put a ban in place afterwards. Yes, there's always going to be psychotic murderers out there, but, I'd feel much safer if I knew those phycho's didn't have a gun in their hand (which I do feel safe because I know they can't go to the nearest store and pick up an assault rifle).

Point is, you Americans can sit back and just watch these mass shootings of innocent kids go on and at the end of the day, all you care about are your guns. I mean, how many more shootings of presidents or innocent people will it take before you ban them?
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.