You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#11. Posted:
Asymmetrical
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: May 13, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,583
Reputation Power: 151
Status: Offline
Joined: May 13, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,583
Reputation Power: 151
You said SLIGHTLY NEW...

and

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]

[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#12. Posted:
Prohibit
  • Gold Gifter
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,070
Reputation Power: 346
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,070
Reputation Power: 346
Zykai wrote
Asymmetrical wrote
Zykai wrote But something simple and clean anybody can do, you know what i mean?


No they cant actually.

And you claimed to like Abstract and Unique, yet you created generic and overdone.

If Clean and Simple is easy...do it....effectively

I never claimed to be anything i stated in the whole topic that i am NEW so i don't know where you got that from

Maybe from the reply you made to someone?

"But would simple look good, it just simple ya know? I like abstract and unique things but really clean and smooth are nice also"
#13. Posted:
Panigale
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,513
Reputation Power: 213
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 09, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,513
Reputation Power: 213
Zykai wrote
Asymmetrical wrote
Zykai wrote But something simple and clean anybody can do, you know what i mean?


No they cant actually.

And you claimed to like Abstract and Unique, yet you created generic and overdone.

If Clean and Simple is easy...do it....effectively

I never claimed to be anything i stated in the whole topic that i am NEW so i don't know where you got that from

You said right here that you like "abstract and unique."
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
#14. Posted:
Illustrated
  • Ninja
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Hoop wrote I'd stay away from the "GFX" logo's, there is nothing unique about the logos, just some 3D text, with flares and 1000's of overlays.

I'd follow the 2D route, to create simple logo's.


That's not a logo?
I don't think he ever said it was supposed to be a logo either, haha.
#15. Posted:
Prohibit
  • TTG Undisputed
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,070
Reputation Power: 346
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 24, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,070
Reputation Power: 346
Illustrated wrote
Hoop wrote I'd stay away from the "GFX" logo's, there is nothing unique about the logos, just some 3D text, with flares and 1000's of overlays.

I'd follow the 2D route, to create simple logo's.


That's not a logo?
I don't think he ever said it was supposed to be a logo either, haha.

Have you not read the topic title?...
#16. Posted:
Illustrated
  • Graphics King
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 22, 201212Year Member
Posts: 3,432
Reputation Power: 377
RDB wrote
Illustrated wrote
Hoop wrote I'd stay away from the "GFX" logo's, there is nothing unique about the logos, just some 3D text, with flares and 1000's of overlays.

I'd follow the 2D route, to create simple logo's.


That's not a logo?
I don't think he ever said it was supposed to be a logo either, haha.

Have you not read the topic title?...

Hahaha, well you got me there.
I just glanced at the title... Completely missed the parenthesis.

Regardless, this isn't a logo.
#17. Posted:
NFT
  • Winter 2021
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,395
Reputation Power: 116
Status: Offline
Joined: Sep 18, 201014Year Member
Posts: 2,395
Reputation Power: 116
I understand it's not great, but you tried your best. I would move away from the 3D text aspect as that could be done by anyone, try to go for simple yet effective 2D stuff. We all start somewhere, just try your best and keep on at it


Last edited by NFT ; edited 1 time in total
#18. Posted:
2k15
  • TTG Senior
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,107
Reputation Power: 54
Status: Offline
Joined: Jan 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 1,107
Reputation Power: 54
Way to many flares and overlays.
It is just the same generic 3D work.
I would stay away from that and move onto 2D.
When I first started I used to make stuff like this and think it was really unique
(which clearly it wasn't as they are everywhere) I then started
to do 2D work and it looked so much better and I wouldn't have to use flares and 100's of overlays.
So to sum this up stay away from the same generic 3D work.
#19. Posted:
CriticaI
  • Supporter
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,753
Reputation Power: 452
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201311Year Member
Posts: 2,753
Reputation Power: 452
Hoop wrote I'd stay away from the "GFX" logo's, there is nothing unique about the logos, just some 3D text, with flares and 1000's of overlays.

I'd follow the 2D route, to create simple logo's.


Where's the logo at?
All I saw was a YouTube banner.

This isn't Star Trek.
Stay away from so many lens flares.
#20. Posted:
919
  • Rising Star
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 10, 201311Year Member
Posts: 761
Reputation Power: 35
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 10, 201311Year Member
Posts: 761
Reputation Power: 35
Not a logo, don't mean to be like every one else but if you're going to go for an abstract look don't copy other styles, if you do that isn't abstract... It's dumb be original i might be the only designer that still like abstract/complex designs nowadays but that's just pointing me towards simple & clean just like everyone else... Rate: -10/10

Note: -10 = negative ten not a typo
Jump to:
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.