You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.
#21. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 480
Reputation Power: 17
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 480
Reputation Power: 17
Novel wroteCODLTHAT1OR3O wroteNovel wroteCODLTHAT1OR3O wroteKerrigan wrote This is how I feel on gun control.
I don't want guns banned, I want more extensive background checks and psychological evaluations done. Assault Rifles should require modifications to be useless unless they are on a protected premises on a place like a gun range. Why? What the hell do you need an automatic weapon for?
You're saying that with more guns around, less people are robbed.
Not always the case. Here's a possibility, Robber shoots a few people, someone shoots Robber, other robber shoots back.
So it can end up being a massacre because of guns being easily accessed. I know people who have drug charges and gun possession charges, and bought hand guns legally. I had one of them pointed at me.
To put it simply:
-Make sure the person is sound enough to own a weapon
-Require a license on you at all times while having a weapon, therefore you can be arrested and/or the weapon confiscated for carrying one with a license.
-Require powerful weapons (AR's, automatics, etc.) to have a certain amount of modifications done or another way to limit usage off of certain areas.
1. full auto guns are SO MUCH FUN to shoot
2. A massacre is UNARMED citizens getting killed do a little more research next time you post in the conspiracy forum.
Standard English dictates that the word 'Massacre' relates to indiscriminate killing.
The words definition was twisted when it was adopted from Mandarin Chinese words given to instances when members of villages and tribes were rounded up into small areas and arrows were fired from the walls at the sides as 'massacre' during the carving out of the empire.
I also think it would be fun to fire the Death Star's cannon, does this make it right?
I meant as in my backyard or at a ranch or shooting range, not at people
...and I meant at an empty, dead planet.
Then go for it then if it's dead. Pluto shoot pluto not really a planet but no one likes pluto
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#22. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Jun 02, 201212Year Member
Posts: 2,049
Reputation Power: 96
Honestly gun control is stupid. There's no point of it. I love ohio because they are not following the law just like texas. I own a few high powered snipers and a few rifles.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#23. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 02, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,915
Reputation Power: 77
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 02, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,915
Reputation Power: 77
CODLTHAT1OR3O wroteKerrigan wrote This is how I feel on gun control.
I don't want guns banned, I want more extensive background checks and psychological evaluations done. Assault Rifles should require modifications to be useless unless they are on a protected premises on a place like a gun range. Why? What the hell do you need an automatic weapon for?
You're saying that with more guns around, less people are robbed.
Not always the case. Here's a possibility, Robber shoots a few people, someone shoots Robber, other robber shoots back.
So it can end up being a massacre because of guns being easily accessed. I know people who have drug charges and gun possession charges, and bought hand guns legally. I had one of them pointed at me.
To put it simply:
-Make sure the person is sound enough to own a weapon
-Require a license on you at all times while having a weapon, therefore you can be arrested and/or the weapon confiscated for carrying one with a license.
-Require powerful weapons (AR's, automatics, etc.) to have a certain amount of modifications done or another way to limit usage off of certain areas.
1. full auto guns are SO MUCH FUN to shoot
2. A massacre is UNARMED citizens getting killed do a little more research next time you post in the conspiracy forum.
1) So is burning things. Want to go to court and try to get my arson charge revoked? No?
Honestly, just because something is fun doesn't make it right to be legal.
Drugs are fun. Speeding is fun. I'm sure using grenades is fun. etc. Your logic is stupid.
2) [ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
Idiot. Before you correct someone, make sure you are 100% correct. Either way, everyone understands the point. My respect for you as dropped ten fold just in that last reply.
CODLTHAT1OR3O wroteNovel wroteCODLTHAT1OR3O wroteKerrigan wrote This is how I feel on gun control.
I don't want guns banned, I want more extensive background checks and psychological evaluations done. Assault Rifles should require modifications to be useless unless they are on a protected premises on a place like a gun range. Why? What the hell do you need an automatic weapon for?
You're saying that with more guns around, less people are robbed.
Not always the case. Here's a possibility, Robber shoots a few people, someone shoots Robber, other robber shoots back.
So it can end up being a massacre because of guns being easily accessed. I know people who have drug charges and gun possession charges, and bought hand guns legally. I had one of them pointed at me.
To put it simply:
-Make sure the person is sound enough to own a weapon
-Require a license on you at all times while having a weapon, therefore you can be arrested and/or the weapon confiscated for carrying one with a license.
-Require powerful weapons (AR's, automatics, etc.) to have a certain amount of modifications done or another way to limit usage off of certain areas.
1. full auto guns are SO MUCH FUN to shoot
2. A massacre is UNARMED citizens getting killed do a little more research next time you post in the conspiracy forum.
Standard English dictates that the word 'Massacre' relates to indiscriminate killing.
The words definition was twisted when it was adopted from Mandarin Chinese words given to instances when members of villages and tribes were rounded up into small areas and arrows were fired from the walls at the sides as 'massacre' during the carving out of the empire.
I also think it would be fun to fire the Death Star's cannon, does this make it right?
I meant as in my backyard or at a ranch or shooting range, not at people
This is why I mentioned only being legal in secluded areas.
Derp. Sorry you can't read.
You do realize that something airborne has to land eventually, right? People get hit by bullets all the time from a misfire or someone shooting up in the air a few blocks away.
[ Register or Signin to view external links. ]
My families neighbor actually got hit by a stray bullet from a park because people were shooting in the air. Safe enough to shoot randomly?
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#24. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 480
Reputation Power: 17
Status: Offline
Joined: Feb 17, 201212Year Member
Posts: 480
Reputation Power: 17
It's called I have a shooting range in my backyard and we have the permits for rapid fire firearms so I can shoot a M4 right now but I'm talking about anyone to be able to own a fully automatic firearm.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#25. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 02, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,915
Reputation Power: 77
Status: Offline
Joined: Aug 02, 201212Year Member
Posts: 1,915
Reputation Power: 77
CODLTHAT1OR3O wrote It's called I have a shooting range in my backyard and we have the permits for rapid fire firearms so I can shoot a M4 right now but I'm talking about anyone to be able to own a fully automatic firearm.
I'm sorry, I didn't realize that bullets didn't misfire and hit someone nearby or penetrate objects.
Now if you are one of the few who are in a secluded area, fine understandable. But at least 80% of the United States has a nearby neighbor. (My estimate, but it makes sense. I travel all the time and houses generally are close together and country settings are becoming less common)
Not everyone has a shooting range nearby, let alone in their back yard :facepalm:.
The issue is that people are basing laws off of personal experience and personal gain. Kill an extra 300 people a year just because I'm in the minority who isn't in a heavily populated area and I won't shoot someone just because.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#26. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 27, 201311Year Member
Posts: 55
Reputation Power: 2
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 27, 201311Year Member
Posts: 55
Reputation Power: 2
i think you put that very well my fellow texan there just trying to make it easier for the government to have more power if the people were to have to fight the government but regardless i think stronger gun control is just ridiculous
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#27. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 904
Reputation Power: 38
Status: Offline
Joined: Nov 05, 201212Year Member
Posts: 904
Reputation Power: 38
Gun control or at least more of it was always a ridiculous idea !.
There are way to many guns already out there for any new gun control laws to have any effect.
BUT.....
What is the biggest commodity shortage in America today ?.
It's ammunition !!.
So Who do you think is controling that ?.
It's a no brainer really!!.
There are way to many guns already out there for any new gun control laws to have any effect.
BUT.....
What is the biggest commodity shortage in America today ?.
It's ammunition !!.
So Who do you think is controling that ?.
It's a no brainer really!!.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#28. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 397
Reputation Power: 15
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 30, 201113Year Member
Posts: 397
Reputation Power: 15
Kerrigan wrote This is how I feel on gun control.This is exactly why people need to be informed. A so called "Assault weapon" (which is actually just a sporting rifle" shoots SEMI-AUTOMATIC. Diane Fienstein herself probably doesn't even know that.
I don't want guns banned, I want more extensive background checks and psychological evaluations done. Assault Rifles should require modifications to be useless unless they are on a protected premises on a place like a gun range. Why? What the hell do you need an automatic weapon for?
You're saying that with more guns around, less people are robbed.
Not always the case. Here's a possibility, Robber shoots a few people, someone shoots Robber, other robber shoots back.
So it can end up being a massacre because of guns being easily accessed. I know people who have drug charges and gun possession charges, and bought hand guns legally. I had one of them pointed at me.
To put it simply:
-Make sure the person is sound enough to own a weapon
-Require a license on you at all times while having a weapon, therefore you can be arrested and/or the weapon confiscated for carrying one with a license.
-Require powerful weapons (AR's, automatics, etc.) to have a certain amount of modifications done or another way to limit usage off of certain areas.
ALSO, automatic firearms are ILLEGAL in the hands of civilians. Only law enforcement and other military-type personal can own one.
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#29. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 12, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,586
Reputation Power: 87
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 12, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,586
Reputation Power: 87
CODLTHAT1OR3O wrote It's called I have a shooting range in my backyard and we have the permits for rapid fire firearms so I can shoot a M4 right now but I'm talking about anyone to be able to own a fully automatic firearm.
No you dont call of duty kiddy,there is no permit for pre 1986 assault weapons you just have to pay a $200 tax and register the gun. You only get a permit as a dealer to sell the guns, stop trying to be a firearms expert from call of duty.
The process takes upwards of 6 months and involves intense background checks.
Last edited by Latias ; edited 1 time in total
- 0useful
- 0not useful
#30. Posted:
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 12, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,586
Reputation Power: 87
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 12, 201013Year Member
Posts: 2,586
Reputation Power: 87
DiamondCoding wrote Honestly gun control is stupid. There's no point of it. I love ohio because they are not following the law just like texas. I own a few high powered snipers and a few rifles.
No gun is a "sniper" unless in the hands of a trained sniper, until that point it is a high powered rifle.You guys need to stop getting firearms knowledge solely from call of duty.
- 1useful
- 0not useful
You are viewing our Forum Archives. To view or take place in current topics click here.