#7411. Posted:
OhDiegoCosta
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,366
Reputation Power: 357
Status: Offline
Joined: Dec 22, 201113Year Member
Posts: 4,366
Reputation Power: 357
360MoTioN wrote
HTAFC wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.


Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.
He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could


Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.


Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.
#7412. Posted:
CompleteDesigns
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
360MoTioN wrote
HTAFC wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.


Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.
He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could


Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.


LOL , He would turn CFC down but not UTD? , You are stuck in "We deserve everything , We win everything , We are everything" mentality , This isnt about you anymore , You are no longer "Up there" its CFC and City and there are very few superstars in the world that turn down a move to CFC.
#7413. Posted:
Brad
  • Retired Staff
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
360MoTioN wrote
HTAFC wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.


Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.
He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could


Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.


As it stands (Although these could change) Chelsea have a better team and are going to be competing for more titles than United. If guaranteed a starting position at both teams, I'd be more inclined to think that he would join Chelsea
#7414. Posted:
CompleteDesigns
  • TTG Fanatic
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 28, 201212Year Member
Posts: 4,076
Reputation Power: 182
OhDiegoCosta wrote
360MoTioN wrote
HTAFC wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.


Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.
He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could


Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.


Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.


What you talking about? , I would much rather a Falcoa who has hardly "Hit the ground running" on Loan for a riduculus fee as well as Di maria over Costa and Fabregas (Remember the guy who UTD wanted?) , Who actually fit into our team and was apart of a plan (That was paid for by David luiz etc , Nice guy)

/sarcasm

Id say right now we are the best in the PL at getting players and the biggest catch in the PL , City have loads of cash and UTD have the cash / fanbase but looking at it as a footballer , We have everything sorted - Medics (Barely any injuries) , Facalities , One of the best managers in the world , Great staff , A young team with potential.
#7415. Posted:
Fielding
  • Shoutbox Hero
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
Status: Offline
Joined: Oct 19, 201212Year Member
Posts: 5,359
Reputation Power: 405
CompleteDesigns wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote
360MoTioN wrote
HTAFC wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.


Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.
He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could


Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.


Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.

Fabregas (Remember the guy who UTD wanted?)


funny that united never bid for him though...
#7416. Posted:
nice_gamer
  • TTG Addict
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,037
Reputation Power: 1150
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,037
Reputation Power: 1150
To be honest, Chelsea could have any player they want - providing they aren't already loyal to their club (like your Lahms, Messis etc). They are the strongest side in the premier league, and favourites to win - which would entice any foreign player given how coveted the BPL trophy is. They also look like the only english club to realistically challenge for the UCL.

Also a lot of players are drawn in by the idea of living in London - and where nicer than the Chelsea/Kensington area.. There are a load of things players have to think about - I mean the reason supposedly Sanchez didn't want to go to United is that he always wanted to live and play in London.

Don't think anyone can argue at this stage in time United are more appealing to a player than Chelsea
#7417. Posted:
Dive
  • Christmas!
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,156
Reputation Power: 95
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,156
Reputation Power: 95
OhDiegoCosta wrote
360MoTioN wrote
HTAFC wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.


Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.
He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could


Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.


Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.



160k is high for a player of his class?

Also it doesn't mean anything where you sit in the table as long as you're in the top 4 with a good chance at getting the CL.

United have won 5 times more leagues than Chelsea and when we won it 3 times on the trot we couldn't get any player we wanted.
That's to you -Fletcher
#7418. Posted:
nice_gamer
  • Blind Luck
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,037
Reputation Power: 1150
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 19, 201113Year Member
Posts: 2,037
Reputation Power: 1150
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote
360MoTioN wrote
HTAFC wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.


Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.
He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could


Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.


Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.



160k is high for a player of his class?

Also it doesn't mean anything where you sit in the table as long as you're in the top 4 with a good chance at getting the CL.

United have won 5 times more leagues than Chelsea and when we won it 3 times on the trot we couldn't get any player we wanted.
That's to you -Fletcher


Note "at this stage in time"

If you want to live in the past then fine - Everton have won 9 Division 1 titles (look how irrelevant that is)
#7419. Posted:
Brad
  • Retired Staff
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
Status: Offline
Joined: Jul 04, 201014Year Member
Posts: 5,770
Reputation Power: 530
-Fletcher wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote
360MoTioN wrote
HTAFC wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.


Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.
He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could


Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.


Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.



160k is high for a player of his class?

Also it doesn't mean anything where you sit in the table as long as you're in the top 4 with a good chance at getting the CL.

United have won 5 times more leagues than Chelsea and when we won it 3 times on the trot we couldn't get any player we wanted.
That's to you -Fletcher


Note "at this stage in time"

If you want to live in the past then fine - Everton have won 9 Division 1 titles (look how irrelevant that is)


Nah mate, they won the league 5 more times than Chelsea, every single player in the world would obviously join them over every other team in the world.
#7420. Posted:
Dive
  • 2 Million
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,156
Reputation Power: 95
Status: Offline
Joined: Apr 06, 201410Year Member
Posts: 2,156
Reputation Power: 95
Brad- wrote
-Fletcher wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote
360MoTioN wrote
HTAFC wrote
360MoTioN wrote
OhDiegoCosta wrote Let's be honest, if Chelsea wanted to sign Hummels as badly as United do, the deal would be done in less than a week. Can't see why United court their signings for so long/struggle to wrap up deals.


Chelsea signing hummels? In your dreams if he didn't want to go to united in the transfer window what makes think Chelsea could sign him? Remember we signed big names in the summer.
He didn't say Chelsea wanted to, he said IF Chelsea wanted to then they could


Yeah I'm saying they couldn't.


Just because United couldn't sign him, doesn't mean Chelsea couldn't. United are nowhere near the proposition they used to be whilst football fans from lots of rival clubs envy Chelsea's negotiating staff right now. When we want a player, we go out and get him.

United did get Di Maria and Falcao on loan. Di Maria had his price upped by 10 million because United bragged about being willing to break the British transfer record. His wages are pretty damn high as well. The only
other team reckless enough to make that deal were PSG so congrats, you tempted a player away from the lucrative ligue 1. Falcao, again reckless wages, big loan fee and Monaco needed rid of him.

I don't think your summer transfer business is impressive at all.

United used to be a huge force in football deals. The second a player realised United were in for him, it was more or less game over for other English clubs. Now however, the tables have changed. We're better at getting players in than you.



160k is high for a player of his class?

Also it doesn't mean anything where you sit in the table as long as you're in the top 4 with a good chance at getting the CL.

United have won 5 times more leagues than Chelsea and when we won it 3 times on the trot we couldn't get any player we wanted.
That's to you -Fletcher


Note "at this stage in time"

If you want to live in the past then fine - Everton have won 9 Division 1 titles (look how irrelevant that is)


Nah mate, they won the league 5 more times than Chelsea, every single player in the world would obviously join them over every other team in the world.


Typical arrogant Chelsea fans reading only want he wants to read.
I was saying we've won far more titles than Chelsea and we couldn't get any player we wanted so how would Chelsea.

You seem to think when you're linked with a player it's a one horse race, if that's how you think then you're very peculiar.
Users browsing this topic: None
Jump to:


RECENT POSTS

HOT TOPICS