Modern Warfare 3 Fires Back at the Competition

4
As the release dates for both Battlefield 3 and Modern Warfare come closer, the mud-slinging is becoming dirtier with each passing day. This time it’s the co-developer of Modern Warfare 3 kicking wet dust DICE’s way, with the studio’s co-founder and general manager Glen Schofield saying, “I’d be a little scared at this point – in June – if I was looking forward to a particular game that wasn’t on the console and running at 60.”
That’s what he said while speaking in a recent interview with AusGamers. When asked about Battlefield 3′s brand new Frostbite 2 engine he said, “You can go out and name your engine and call it whatever you want, right. You know, I’ve done that before, I’ve seen that trick and the bottom line is, this game will run at 60 frames a second. Not sure any of our competitors will.”
“Not sure I’ve seen any of our competitors on the console, especially running at 60 frames a second, and I’d be a little scared at this point – in June – if I was looking forward to a particular game that wasn’t on the console and running at 60.
I think 60 is our competitive edge and you just don’t throw that away. You don’t ship an engine, you ship a game.”
Modern Warfare 3 will be released on November 8th worldwide for PS3, Xbox 360 and PC. Battlefield 3 will release on October 8th for the same platforms.

Posted:

Source: http://www.gamesthirst.com/2011/06/29/sledgehammer-to-dice-you-ship-a-game-not-an-engine/

Comments

"Modern Warfare 3 Fires Back at the Competition" :: Login/Create an Account :: 103 comments

If you would like to post a comment please signin to your account or register for an account.

ticketPosted:

MW3 is just going to be a mw2 with a tad more features doesn't really look like anything new in my opinion. Battlefield 3 looks a lot funner and better. I don't care for the frame rates on consoles as i will be getting it on pc.

LGNDxTR1CKKzPosted:

MW3 Gameplay from New York looks great in some parts and some parts from BF3 Gameplay look great as well. The frame rate In MW3 Will be better but they both have things that the others don't that make those games the games that they are. And yes battlefield has there dedicated servers but COD has the option of local only now which prevents as much lag

But I will be getting both games as they both have parts that make them so good.

-Conner-FanboyPosted:

lol I don't think people realise they've been playing the same game for years with call of duty! They're always the same!

hazardxaePosted:

Bottom line is, Modern Warfare 3 is going to beat sales, that's already a done deal. But when you playing BF your playing in a WAY diffrent style because MW and BF are not the same type of games. I personally want BF because there offering something new too the table, and modern warfare got as they say "a fresh coat of paint". If modern warfare mind **** everybody that got it, i'll get it. But until then it won't be on my list for stuff to save money for.

MrVonNadePosted:

No one cares which game is better in the end everyone is just gonna go back to COD as its got the most community and tbh most fun...

iGodlyPosted:

-Frostbite-
Snakebl00d
-Frostbite- Battlefield 3 Is Superior Than Modern Warfare 3.It has a new engine that they spend almost a year and a half making.
While Modern Warfare 3 Is Going To Use The SAME Engine As Modern Warfare 2.

Battlefield 3 is Going To Be Superior. Grow Up And Accept It.

-Frostbite-

GTFO COD has always been superior and it will stay that way


ohhh god.. I Hate Fanboys, Im Not Discussing With You Kid.
-Frostbite-
Fristbite ur an idiot and a fan boy of battlefield ....nuff said games are well developed for a reason and BF is for kids or adults that want 2 chill and have fun will cod is for either 2 but its way more fun and thats how its been and will be lmao

fitz226Posted:

TTGxxSniperxx mw3 isnt much different i personally think bf3 will be wayyy better theres always somethin bf3 can do that mw3 cant and that is allowing you to blow up/ take down buildings. you can destroy almost anything in bf3 can you in mw3 didnt think so.

all in all i'll still buy both games though


Not exactly fair to say that yet, and i'm fed up of people saying MW3 "isn't much different". I'm not a fanboy, I play BC2 and Black Ops evenly, but seriously all we've seen is two campaign missions and a couple of sneak peeks at survival mode. Don't judge it this quick.

marcusmonsoonPosted:

xBIG_SIMMONSx When I read 30 FPS a while ago I literally moaned UGHHH. Why? BFBC2 runs at 30 and I find it suuuuper clunky. The controls aren't as responsive on console either compared to CoD.
It's because your character is actually weighed down by the 15+ kilo weapon he's holding in his hands. Not to mention the extra weight from the ammunition he's carrying.

marcusmonsoonPosted:

LOL! That's the only thing MW3 has to fight back!? 60 f*cking frames a second? Wow, that certainly sounds godly /s.

I, quite honestly, could not care less about 30 fps. At least I know that the game I'm getting will be fun and not an over the top consortium of sh*t stains. Long live the BF series. ,,/,

SOLIDF3ARPosted:

Battlefield 3 will still run great at 30 FPS, BF:BC 2 ran at 30 FPS and I thought it was way smoother than the twitchy 5 year old COD engine